logologo
jmichael@jmcvoiceover.com 202-738-1151
  • Home
  • My Demos
    • Commercial
    • Crisis Commercials
    • Medical
    • eLearning
    • Corporate
    • Automotive
    • TV Promo
    • TV Narration
    • Radio Imaging
    • Telephony
    • Political
  • Recent Work
  • Demo Production
    • Commercial
    • Medical
    • eLearning
    • Corporate
    • Automotive
    • TV Promo
    • TV Narration
    • Radio Imaging
    • Telephony
    • Political
  • Coaching
  • Photo Gallery
  • Success Club
  • Euro Vo Retreat
  • Public Speaker Training
  • Giving Back
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • My Demos
    • Commercial
    • Crisis Commercials
    • Medical
    • eLearning
    • Corporate
    • Automotive
    • TV Promo
    • TV Narration
    • Radio Imaging
    • Telephony
    • Political
  • Recent Work
  • Demo Production
    • Commercial
    • Medical
    • eLearning
    • Corporate
    • Automotive
    • TV Promo
    • TV Narration
    • Radio Imaging
    • Telephony
    • Political
  • Coaching
  • Photo Gallery
  • Success Club
  • Euro Vo Retreat
  • Public Speaker Training
  • Giving Back
  • Blog
  • Contact

Like a hornet’s nest that has been smacked unexpectedly by a baseball bat intent on disrupting its tranquility, the voiceover community has been in an uproar over the past two weeks since news of Voices.com’s acqusition of Voicebank.net was announced to the world. The combination of two large job aggregators which operate in different spheres of the marketplace seemed portentous of doom and domination at first, in line with the publicly stated policies of Voices.com leadership, (the domination part, at least.) The shock to the talent community was, and still is, palpable.

Nevertheless, as with all things, time affords perspective. While the news is still fairly fresh, the nest remains intact, if dented, and the collective buzz is starting to settle into a determination to protect and preserve….and, perhaps, to swarm.

Voices.com has openly stated that they want to take over the world of voiceover, becoming the reflexive choice for buyers both union and non-union alike to source their talent. The acquisition of Voicebank.net gives them an entree into the realm of union VO, ostensibly moving them closer to their stated goal. They promise that nothing will change with the way Voicebank operates. If this is the case, the addition of their resources, backed by Morgan Stanley, could serve simply to grow Voicebank and increase opportunities across the board. In a vacuum, this would be a good thing.

That said, when I hear their promises not to start adding new and various fees to the agents and other consumers using Voicebank, I’m reminded of the old fable about the scorpion who asked an alligator for a ride across the river. “Sure,” the alligator said, “but you have to promise not to sting me, for if you do we shall both surely die.” “I promise,” said the scorpion. Halfway across the river, the alligator felt a searing pain in his back. The scorpion had stung him. “Why did you sting me?!,” the alligator asked. “Now we will both die.” All the scorpion could say in reply was, “It’s my nature.”

Voices.com has demonstrated over and over that their only abiding purpose is profit. Despite numerous promises and overtures over the years, they have systematically eschewed the value of good will in order to squeeze every possible cent from talent and buyers alike. You can make an argument that this makes sense if their sole purpose is to drive the value of the company higher and sell to a larger interest, or launch an IPO where the balance sheet is the only thing investors care about, but few companies thrive without at least some measure of good will between themselves and those they work with or employ. A visit to any VO industry forum will reflect the overwhelming negativity of talent opinion about the company….a negativity which I’m given to understand has left Voicebank’s leadership stunned and saddened at the guilt by association that has attached to a brand that was once embraced by talent and agents. Furthermore, a glance at Voices.com’s review page on Glassdoor.com offers a chilling insight into the company culture. The vast majority of reviews speak of a soul-sucking profit-at-all-costs atmosphere leading to disillusionment. This is not the foundation of a healthy company.

Moreover, while the leadership would like to believe that voice actors are as easily replaceable as Uber drivers, this is belied by the fact that the greater portion of the work on the site is being consistently booked by a couple hundred talent. This realization is surely one of the drivers of the acquisition of Voicebank; As the available labor pool becomes more cognizant of the company’s actions, it will become more disillusioned. Acquiring Voicebank, while looking like a masterstroke on the surface, may also be an act of preservation, hoping to firmly lock-in a larger pool of quality talent to the Voices.com mothership to hedge against the prospect of having a big shiny platform that has been abandoned by those who can do the work well.

Ultimately, though, Voices faces the danger of irrelevancy. If that’s a little hard to swallow while they are staggering around throwing millions of dollars in various directions, I understand…..but think about it.

*Voice123.com charges roughly the same for a membership as Voices.com, and offers a similar quantity of work and a higher quality of work in most cases when compared with Voices.com. Voices.com enforces a 20% commission masquerading as ‘escrow’ against talent, (you can quibble over whether the talent eats this or the buyer pays it, but it comes from the overall budget regardless.) Voice123.com charges no commission to talent or buyers, (though a strictly optional and legitimate escrow system would be welcomed by some.) Bodalgo.com also follows the latter model, and while there is less buyer traffic on Bodalgo, the rates are screened by site ownership and the quality of the jobs on offer is almost universally high.

*Voices.com offers buyers the ability to have their jobs ‘managed’ by an account manager from the site, (people who, despite being good and well-meaning folks in my experience, have no industry background,) who then curates the talent presented to the buyer, and does everything in their power to prevent the talent from having contact with the buyer. For this service they retain 40-50% of the client’s overall budget according to a recent interview with their CEO. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfLy654-h2k&app=desktop) Meanwhile, long-established agencies charge about half this amount to perform the same function, fielding a roster of talent selected strictly on merit, with no regard to how low they are willing to bid for a job.

Given these facts, it is hard to see what value Voices.com offers to buyers when compared with rivals Voice123.com and Bodalgo.com, and when compared with traditional talent agents and casting directors who have years of industry experience. Why would a buyer spend 20% more to use Voices.com than they would spend to use Voice123.com or Bodalgo.com? Why would they pay a Voices.com ‘manager’ double what an agent would charge? Especially when the same pool of talent are generally available on the other sites and on those agency rosters? It just doesn’t make sense. Voices.com adds no value to the process on the buyer side, and as this becomes clearer to those who hire from the site, it’s hard to see why they would keep their business there.

Those of you who know me know that I supported Voices.com for many years. I still believe that the concept of online casting will be the driving force in our marketplace for years to come, whether that is in the form of current players, new initiatives incorporating agents, casting directors, and the union, or some other shape that we haven’t seen yet. I once very sincerely believed that Voices.com could be that platform, and that all boats could rise together under a tide driven by the ease of use of the site, and the broad reach of their SEO. Indeed, there’s no reason that even now Voices.com could not make necessary overtures and concessions to the talent community and traditional casting community in order to integrate everyone into their vision of prosperity. Perhaps the leadership of Morgan Stanley Expansion Capital can overcome the instincts driving the corporate culture in London, Ontario, and recognize that establishing rapport with the people who drive their business will be good for all involved. I fear, however, that the rapacious lust for money that has permeated this company may ultimately prove too entrenched. After all, it’s their nature.

Trackback URL: https://www.jmcvoiceover.com/2017/08/23/voices-com-wants-to-be-the-facebook-of-voiceover-heres-why-they-might-become-myspace-instead/trackback/

J. Michael Collins
Previous PostTalent Profiles: Jodi Krangle
Next PostBidding on Online Casting Sites: How to Maxim...
12 Comments
  • Love That Rebecca August 23, 2017 Reply

    Very good. Well said.

  • Tracy Parsons August 23, 2017 Reply

    Thanks for that. I was with Voices for nearly 8 years but cancelled last year due to a lack of ROI (lots of "likes", little work). They are still trying to get me back…not gonna happen.

  • Martha Mellinger August 23, 2017 Reply

    Very thoughtful and articulate. Thank you.

  • Moe Rock August 24, 2017 Reply

    Well said J Mike!

  • Unknown August 24, 2017 Reply

    Curious if those "likes" were mostly from Voices employees. I was with them for a while and then started noticing I was getting likes, I thought this was a good sign that I was moving in the right direction. But, then after seeing many negative posts & articles about them and getting a smarmy feeling from the staff member calling me to try to get me to switch from the $49/mo plan to the yearly I decided to check and no surprise all but one of the likes was from Voices employees. In my mind designed to do exactly what it did, encourage me to stay with them.

  • Dustin Ebaugh August 24, 2017 Reply

    It IS their nature, J. Michael. Well said.

  • Naomi Mercer August 24, 2017 Reply

    Great article. After a job with voices.com last year where they did all of the things you stated– on top of my annual fee I paid the escrow fee as well as the hidden account management fee–I was waiting for my account to lapse in October. However, since the acquisition, I've had it deleted. Only took 13 days, three emails, two phone calls and a DMCA takedown notice, ha!

  • lofbomm August 24, 2017 Reply

    Excellent insights here, J. Michael. Bravo! The MySpace analogy is very apropos- I hope that they come to their senses as well, but it seems far more likely that they'll implode under the weight of their sheer size and culture of hubris at this point.

  • Natasha Marchewka August 24, 2017 Reply

    Fantastically stated, J. Michael!!! Wow. So very well articulated.

  • Michael Stuhre August 25, 2017 Reply

    I agree as well. With Voices.com it was all about the money….their making money. I was on for around six months faithfully paying my dues, never made a dime. Got "likes" no gigs, a person can't live on likes. A year ago I discovered ACX, I have completed 32 books in that year, hasn't cost me a dime, and am receiving royalty payments every month. I know it's not the same as voiceover but it is a good avenue to show your vocal skills. Voices.com needs to learn the value of voice artists, not just view them as money makers for them.

  • Debby Barnes August 25, 2017 Reply

    Spot-on, JM. Spot-on.

  • Anonymous January 20, 2018 Reply

    I'm shocked to read this. I worked for Voices.com, and for the entire time I was there, Stephanie and David continuously threw your name into every conversation as the penultimate example of voice acting success. You were a god in their eyes, and we heard nothing of the 124,950 "members" who never got any work – only the 50 or so who made any money from their membership.

    It didn't take long for the stench of their business model to become obvious to anyone who had more than a modicum of self-awareness. They treated staff terribly (bottom of the barrel salaries, clawed back commissions when they felt they didn't "earn" it, never-delivered reviews, constantly changing and arbitrary "quotas" that they often used to justify demotions and firings). They fought relentlessly in meetings (David's tirades against his wife were, and presumably still are, legendary). They freaked out if anyone dared question their business model (I lost count of how many times I got hauled into their offices when a rogue member's complaint threw them into a tizzy. It was one crisis after another).

    They're one technological innovation removed from irrelevance, and your MySpace analogy is spot-on. Would love to see what else you have to say, and where this goes from here. Voices.com does more harm than good, both to the industry and the great talent that powers it. It's time their real story gets out.

Leave a comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives
Subscribe
  • Receive News & Updates
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
RECENT TWEETS

@jmcvoiceover

January 18th 2021 05:01:45

https://t.co/FPkETFCxTZ

@jmcvoiceover

January 18th 2021 01:01:22

https://t.co/89rhMteg8P

Are you honoring your colleagues' kindness when they give you the gift of a recommendation… https://t.co/ewP1XnGptL

@jmcvoiceover

January 14th 2021 11:01:17

@jasonkappus LOL :)

@jmcvoiceover

January 14th 2021 11:01:13

Always a blast working with talent repped by Impressive Talent, and this group was legit impressive! #vo #voiceover https://t.co/lDCKvMQNRW

@jmcvoiceover

January 9th 2021 07:01:49

@aganguzza This x100

@jmcvoiceover

January 8th 2021 11:01:05

Devastated by the loss of @bradvenable May you rest in piece, my friend.

@jmcvoiceover

December 25th 2020 12:12:20

From our family to yours, have a very Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays. Wishing all safety, health, and prosperit… https://t.co/eUp74u7F1Y

@jmcvoiceover

December 22nd 2020 07:12:48

#vo #voiceover https://t.co/DOE7PurDKv

@jmcvoiceover

December 21st 2020 01:12:06

Congrats to JMC Demos clients Doug Turkel, Stacey Kimble, Gaynor Kelly, Jason Kappus, Jenn Henry, and Paul Cartwrig… https://t.co/rAPSAfM4lq

@jmcvoiceover

December 15th 2020 12:12:24

#vo #voiceover https://t.co/rZpdx4tHpn

@jmcvoiceover

December 12th 2020 03:12:27

#vo #voiceover #voiceovers https://t.co/yZQjxA7gC2

@jmcvoiceover

December 11th 2020 12:12:40

https://t.co/BBWJse3954

Check out part 2 of my blog on where the industry stands in the year of COVID, featuring t… https://t.co/TEOzp7WNqT

@jmcvoiceover

December 11th 2020 12:12:03

#vo #voiceover #voiceovers https://t.co/DvppE8uffb

@jmcvoiceover

December 10th 2020 04:12:28

https://t.co/Ow7dpfkQ7D

@jmcvoiceover

December 9th 2020 09:12:18

@jemrosenfeld @Joanthevoice @rgaskins1 @SovasVoice @ThatsVoiceover https://t.co/nEQ2uvdOLs

@jmcvoiceover

December 9th 2020 07:12:08

#vo #voiceover https://t.co/VWtvRtIInx

@jmcvoiceover

December 8th 2020 01:12:50

https://t.co/kjrMJggjFc

@jmcvoiceover

December 7th 2020 12:12:31

https://t.co/6isS4eNAd1

@jmcvoiceover

December 7th 2020 05:12:29

@UrbanLegendVO @jasonkappus That gives new meaning to food porn.

@jmcvoiceover

December 6th 2020 04:12:27

https://t.co/pJz0RhZxHC

@jmcvoiceover

December 5th 2020 06:12:40

https://t.co/nTFRx1uEBX

@jmcvoiceover

December 4th 2020 12:12:09

https://t.co/SfHkVz8pNC

@jmcvoiceover

December 4th 2020 10:12:23

@DustinEbaugh Prayers for your whole family...

@jmcvoiceover

December 3rd 2020 07:12:27

@johnnyheller Note to self: Do not piss off audiobook people. They have words.

@jmcvoiceover

December 3rd 2020 12:12:14

https://t.co/NQBRXHoObP

@jmcvoiceover

December 2nd 2020 12:12:05

https://t.co/Z8eOC5ftXJ

@jmcvoiceover

December 1st 2020 11:12:49

@VoicesByKelli It was my distinct pleasure. You're fantastic!

@jmcvoiceover

December 1st 2020 11:12:15

An advent calendar of VO advice, you say? Here's 1 of 25. #vo #voiceovers #voiceover https://t.co/BCetwGz4uQ

@jmcvoiceover

November 28th 2020 01:11:29

@peterdickson https://t.co/IHLsWBEaJJ

@jmcvoiceover

November 25th 2020 09:11:27

RT @vlbarrera_vo: I am super excited to share my latest episode featuring guest @jmcvoiceover! It was so much fun talking with him and lear…

@jmcvoiceover

November 23rd 2020 12:11:39

@TheMicheleLyman Thank you!

@jmcvoiceover

November 22nd 2020 03:11:18

Check out this great interview with the JMC Demos Animation & Video Game team, led by Matt Curtis! #vo #voiceover… https://t.co/WYM2jvXjQS

@jmcvoiceover

November 21st 2020 09:11:36

@VoxProPat 😳😳😳

@jmcvoiceover

November 21st 2020 08:11:24

Congrats to Soraya Butler on winning the 2020 SOVAS Academic Scholarship! #vo #voiceover #sovas

Photo credit to La… https://t.co/AcS0IERihu

@jmcvoiceover

November 20th 2020 06:11:49

Excited to be a part of That’s Voiceover this weekend. If you haven’t gotten your ticket at https://t.co/eOPOG7QtJq … https://t.co/R8AX4Yy2j9

CONTACT
202-738-1151
jmichael@jmcvoiceover.com
  • Home
  • My Demos
    • Commercial
    • Crisis Commercials
    • Medical
    • eLearning
    • Corporate
    • Automotive
    • TV Promo
    • TV Narration
    • Radio Imaging
    • Telephony
    • Political
  • Recent Work
  • Demo Production
    • Commercial
    • Medical
    • eLearning
    • Corporate
    • Automotive
    • TV Promo
    • TV Narration
    • Radio Imaging
    • Telephony
    • Political
  • Coaching
  • Photo Gallery
  • Success Club
  • Euro Vo Retreat
  • Public Speaker Training
  • Giving Back
  • Blog
  • Contact

Privacy Policy ©2020 J. Michael Collins // Voice Over Site by Voice Actor Websites